The Disease of Alcoholism and its Treatment

One of the great controversies in respect oftype of alcoholic (the typical AA member) and there
treatment of alcohol problems is the debate ofmay be many different types of alcoholics/addicts for
whether alcoholism is a disease.  There is little doubtwhom these symptoms do not apply.  AA members
that regarding alcoholism as a disease, rather than asoften point to the "Doctor's opinion" written by Dr
a moral weakness, has brought benefits to alcoholicsSilkworth in 1939, who discusses alcoholism as an
addicts. To some extent it reduced the stigmaallergy.  However, it begs the question, if these same
experienced by sufferers and has opened the door topeople were to attend their Dr with a different
treatment rather than punishment. It is the mainstay ofcondition and a journal written in 1939 was used as the
the belief system of AA and NA groups who havedefinitive text, would they be quite so happy to accept
been responsible for helping many to recover from athis Dr's opinion. I suspect a second opinion, or more
hopeless state. However there are many critics of thelikely a different doctor, would be sought rapidly.
disease model, both on the grounds that there is littleIn respect of treatment, the current view is that, in the
evidence to support it and that it may in fact bedisease model the alcoholic/addict is portrayed as
detrimental to recovery.someone who has no control over his/her behaviour
Far from supporting the model, much of the evidenceand hence requires treatment to recover. This is often
that has been produced is in direct opposition to it. Forviewed as engendering feelings of helplessness and
example a famous study of alcoholics (Mendelson andencouraging an abnegation of responsibility. In contrast
Mello 1978) found that alcoholics could and did controlthe current view of treatment is that in order for
their craving and consumption. In this experiment theyrecovery to occur the client needs to take
were given the opportunity to work in exchange forresponsibility for his/her behaviour and to be
alcohol and to consume it when and as they wanted.empowered to change. Moreover rather than
Instead of being constantly drunk, it was found that theenforced abstinence the client should have a choice of
subjects worked and consumed alcohol selectively,possible outcomes (ie abstinence, reduction in
sometimes saving some for consumption at a laterconsumption or controlled drinking), so the client is
time. Other studies have found that alcoholics (bothmade to feel greater ownership of his/her recovery
treated and untreated) have returned to patterns ofand is more motivated to succeed.  Interestingly the
problem free consumption. These people are in theresearch suggests that most subjects given a choice
minority but they do nevertheless represent aof outcomes still end up abstinent, however having a
significant number. Finally a new topic in addiction'choice' of outcomes has the effect of increasing
research is what is known as natural recovery, that ismotivation.
changing addictive behaviour without the aid ofWhile the disease model has had some benefits by
treatment. Many studies have found that this is ainitially introducing treatment for alcoholics/addicts,
common route out of addiction. Indeed one large scaleironically it is now viewed by many modern
study found that not only is it common, it is by far thecommentators as being detrimental to treatment. Many
most common route. All of these findings undermineof the concepts of the disease model have been
the validity of the disease model. Even the seminalfound to be fallacious and indeed explainable by other
work of Jellinek, which described the disease modelmechanisms. Nevertheless it continues to be the
originally, was based on work carried out entirely withmainstay of AA and NA and provides benefits for its
members of AA. Hence he was describing a particularmillions of members.