Is Alcoholism a Disease?

One of the great controversies in respect ofHence he was describing a particular type of alcoholic
treatment of alcohol problems is the debate of(the typical AA member) and there may be many
whether alcoholism is a disease. There is little doubtdifferent types of alcoholics/addicts for whom these
that regarding alcoholism as a disease, rather than assymptoms do not apply. AA members often point to
a moral weakness, has brought benefits to alcoholicsthe "Doctor's opinion" written by Dr Silkworth in 1939,
addicts. To some extent it reduced the stigmawho discusses alcoholism as an allergy. However, it
experienced by sufferers and has opened the door tobegs the question, if these same people were to
treatment rather than punishment. It is the mainstay ofattend their Dr with a different condition and that Dr
the belief system of AA and NA groups who haveused a journal written in 1939 as the definitive text for
been responsible for helping many to recover from atreatment, would they be quite so happy to accept this
hopeless state. However there are many critics of theDr's opinion. I suspect a second opinion, or more likely a
disease model, both on the grounds that there is littledifferent doctor, would be sought rapidly.
evidence to support it and that it may in fact beIn respect of treatment, the current view is that, in the
detrimental to recovery.disease model the alcoholic/addict is portrayed as
Far from supporting the model, much of the evidencesomeone who has no control over his/her behavior
that has been produced is in direct opposition to it. Forand hence requires treatment to recover. This is often
example a famous study of alcoholics (Mendelson andviewed as engendering feelings of helplessness and
Mello 1978) found that alcoholics could and did controlencouraging an abnegation of responsibility. In contrast
their craving and consumption. In this experiment theythe current view of treatment is that in order for
were given the opportunity to work in exchange forrecovery to occur the client needs to take
alcohol and to consume it when and as they wanted.responsibility for his/her behavior and to be
Instead of being constantly drunk, it was found that theempowered to change.
subjects worked and consumed alcohol selectively,Moreover rather than enforced abstinence the client
sometimes saving some for consumption at a latershould have a choice of possible outcomes (ie
time. Other studies have found that alcoholics (bothabstinence, reduction in consumption or controlled
treated and untreated) have returned to patterns ofdrinking), so the client is made to feel greater
problem free consumption. These people are in theownership of his/her recovery and is more motivated
minority but they do nevertheless represent ato succeed. Interestingly the research suggests that
significant number. Finally a new topic in addictionmost subjects given a choice of outcomes still end up
research is what is known as natural recovery, that isabstinent, however having a 'choice' of outcomes has
changing addictive behaviour without the aid ofthe effect of increasing motivation.
treatment.While the disease model has had some benefits by
Many studies have found that this is a common routeinitially introducing treatment for alcoholics/addicts,
out of addiction. Indeed one large scale study foundironically it is now viewed by many modern
that not only is it common, it is by far the mostcommentators as being detrimental to treatment. Many
common route. All of these findings undermine theof the concepts of the disease model have been
validity of the disease model. Even the seminal workfound to be fallacious and indeed explainable by other
of Jellinek, which described the disease model originally,mechanisms. Nevertheless it continues to be the
was based on work carried out entirely with membersmainstay of AA and NA and provides benefits for its
of AA.millions of members.